My topic is based on whether this man should receive a death penalty. According to the local law in New Zealand, the death penalty is not legal because of the country’s tolerance towards criminals. Whether he is receiving the death penalty or not is still under discussion. He murdered those Muslims because of the lack of tolerance, but if he is eliminated, there is also an intolerance towards a far-right extremist who may hold his own value system and ideologies. On the other hand, murdering more than 40 people with a pure intention of racism and religion discrimination deserves a death penalty. So this would be a quite tricky problem for the New Zealand politicians to solve.
View on the mass shooting in New Zealand
on