During Writer’s Fortnight, I attended multiple talks and one of those was Joy Haugen’s refugee story. She migrated from South Sudan, across Africa and ended her journey in America. She said that when she moved to the USA she was always seen as the “refugee girl”. This lead me to wonder if the term ‘refugee’ is truly needed.
The word refugee, according to the Oxford Dictionary is “A person who has been forced to leave their country in order to escape war, persecution, or natural disaster.” This doesn’t say anything about race and ethnicity which is what refugees are usually associated with. A refugee could be from any country and have often gone through rough and heartbreaking journeys to get a new country that most likely they have never been to before. So why is it that when people call someone a refugee, does it have a negative connotation? Why doesn’t it receive empathy, like it should, but rather puts someone down? Does this mean it would be better to stop labelling people as refugees and when they integrate into a new society that they should just be someone who moved, also disregarding their heritage and journey?
Reasons Why to Ditch the Term ‘Refugee’
More Culturally Acceptable
Being a refugee means that you have been let onto land that isn’t of your home country. This means that although they have a right to live there, they’re not coming with employment and in lots of cases, they don’t have anyone (family or friends) to look after them. Some conservatives associate this with the thought that a refugee hasn’t earned their right to be in the country, and that they have only been taken in as an obligation, not on merit. This angers many people and is the backbone of racial and status discrimination. Without the term refugee being used more people will accept them into society as there won’t be as many differences anymore to discriminate against. Especially if they’re giving back to society and helping the community that they now call home.
More People to Identify With
Transitioning to a new country can be tough, but as a refugee, in the United States, you are part of a minority group. Minority groups in the past and present have been discriminated against and seen as lesser than the majority countries. This can be seen in cases of white supremacy and cultural segregation. If refugees used the term ‘immigrant’ (A person who comes to live permanently in a foreign country). Immigrants are more socially accepted and they are similar to refugees but have better connotations to it. When someone is an immigrant, they are thought to bring something to the country that they would eventually call ‘home’. As lots of the U.S is made up of immigrants and they play an important role in society it is less likely for them to be discriminated against, making it easier to integrate into society.
Reasons Why Not to Ditch the Term ‘Refugee’
The matter of the fact is refugees shouldn’t have to feel like they have to repress their heritage or their journey to where they are now, especially just to fit into a society that claims to be accepting. This is called cultural assimilation, cultural assimilation is when a minority group or culture is pressured to resemble ideologically and physically like a majority group. There are different types of cultural assimilation, for example, if you are of Cuban origin in the U.S, most Cubans will eventually use English as their first language and eventually start to adopt the main American culture into their everyday lives. As said by Melissa Lozada-Oliva “Assimilation won’t stop until you learn to stay silent and police yourself”, if this assimilation was pushed into the area of refugee status many would forget their journey and not feel the need to talk about not only what happened to them, but happened to their country. If no awareness is raised this could happen to any other country in the world, especially if people denied it happened. Take Syria as an example, before Syria had a bad reputation it was a country where civilised people lived, with their families and went to their jobs like anyone in the western world. Then after a series of catastrophic events, it became a place that people couldn’t even utter the name of without feeling bad. What happened in Syria could happen in any country and without awareness, it could happen again.
As well as cultural assimilation, the journeys that they have been through shouldn’t be silenced. This happens in many situations where people don’t feel like their feelings are recognised and so they don’t open up about what happened to them, leading them into states of depression, anxiety and even PTSD (post-traumatic stress disorder). PTSD is common in children and their parents. This feeling should not be suppressed by society but should also not have to be constantly brought up by the tormenting of the term “refugee girl/boy”. Everyone should have the right to live their lives stress-free or as happily as they can, containing those feelings inside is not healthy for anyone especially if you’re trying to integrate into a new society.
In conclusion, refugee’s should not have to ditch their status just to fit into society because even though they are a minority group they shouldn’t be treated as anything other than an equal. Cultural assimilation shouldn’t occur to make a person’s life better. This also means that they should not be tormented for their past with violent words. No one should feel like their only choice is to change their appearance and the way they represent themselves just to fit into a society that they don’t identify with.
Works Cited
Beiser, Morton, and Daphne Korczak. “Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder.” Caring for Kids New to Canada, 2018, www.kidsnewtocanada.ca/mental-health/ptsd.
Lozada-Oliva, Melissa. “Donald Trump’s Fear of Spanish Reveals the Power in Our Language – and Identity | Melissa Lozada-Oliva.” The Guardian, Guardian News and Media, 10 Sept. 2015, www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/sep/10/donald-trumps-fear-spanish-power-language-identity.
Wondering if lots of cultural aspects of a person’s journey eventually become merged into one so that society loses its individuality. What do you think Lily?
Also great to read how two words can have quite different meanings and responses from those who have moved to a new country.
May be you should look at voices for refugees next year and participate in that.
Wondering if trying to merge in the different cultures are lost and become combined into one. What do you think Lily? Interesting to find out that two words can have such different stigma.
May be you should look at being part of voices of refugees next year.
1. What might have made this article more engaging/relevant for you?
I find this topic very interesting living in a country where I am an immigrant. I think it would have been interesting to include research from other countries such as UK, Australia and SE Asia. Also to look at how the children/grandchildren of refugees view themselves.
2. What insights has the article given you to this issue? The link to the article is
It is interesting that where you are a refugee from is so important when it should be that you are human who needs shelter.
1. What could there have more or less of to make this article more powerful?
I feel as though this article was really powerful and I was able to clearly understand the pros and cons of the term ‘refugee’. However, as this is an opinion editorial, I was a bit unsure as to what you believed, as the title seems to hint that the word should be abolished, however, your conclusion only talks about why it shouldn’t be, and I am unsure if this is your personal opinion or just a summary of the positives that come with the term. So I would like to read more about your personal opinion.
2. Is there a part of the article that you think is particularly effective?
I think your second paragraph is very effective in giving the readers more of an insight as to what a refugee is, especially when you quote from the Oxford Dictionary. I also think it does a really solid job at introducing the next part of your essay – I really liked the rhetorical questions.
Overall I found this article interesting and insightful and I think you did a very good job!
I really like how you explored both sides of this argument, when talking if the word refugee should be abolished. After reading your article, I have a clearer understanding of the connotations associated with “refugee” and understand more about the reasons why it has such negative connotations. Overall I really liked this article and liked seeing how your perspective was formed throughout all the information you gathered.
After reading this I came to conclusion that the topic of refugees, notably the way they are percieved and “treated” by people amongst the world, is a very broad one. The issue has many contradicting perspectives and viewpoints as to how refugees should be “labelled”, or if they even deserve to be. What I liked is that you included detailed descriptions about each perspective of those who where in favour of ditching the term “refugee” and those who were not. This gave us insight into why both perspectives think in such ways and the reasoning behind it. You used good terms, logic and reasoning behind your main points, that gave the reader a good impression as we then accounted this as reliable and credible information.