“The Vine and the Fish” Reflection

The Vine and the Fish

The extended metaphor of “The Vine and the Fish” compares invasive species (the kudzu and the Asian carp/silverfin) to Asian Americans. In a way, the metaphor works. For one, it seems to say that, in a capitalist society such as the USA, immigrants (in the case of the article, Asian Americans) are seen as “invaders” and something to eradicate unless they contribute meaningfully to the economy. A second meaning that arises from the metaphor is that Americans see immigrants as “invaders”: something initially useful but ultimately detrimental to the American environment and lifestyle; and eventually the idea engrains itself into the minds of Asian Americans. in a way, the invasive species not only represents Asian Americans but also the internal racism that Asian immigrants learn. Hook seems to be criticising the American tendency to categorise people into strict groupings, and then exclude people based on these categorisations, when the situation is a lot more nuanced; for example, the kudzu, while an invasive species, offers many benefits like a source of nutrients or being able to be made into shampoo. In fact, she points out that language plays a large role into this categorisation and exclusion; the fact that the Asian carp is connected to Asians and the fact that Trump calls the coronavirus the “Chinese virus” makes it easier for people justify excluding immigrants.

However, from an environmentalist perspective, the metaphor becomes unstable. Because, regardless of the economic benefits that kudzu or the Asian carp offers, it is undeniable that invasive species destroy native ecosystems and environments. By adhering to the metaphor set by Hook, it would seem that the most obvious solution would be to stop immigration completely.  Hook simplifies two complex situations to create her metaphor. Likewise, the metaphor ignores the voices of Native Americans, who would be the actual native environment being “invaded” in the context of the metaphor, not the voices of white Americans.

English Lit HL IO Reflection

Challenges

  • Time limit of 10 minutes
    • Had to take out some evidence and analysis
      • Shortened analysis of “scrawny, lank gray hair” from The RoTook out analysis of “… very few superior individuals, made of the stuff of martyrs and saints”
  • Development of global issue
    • Stuck in mentality that I had to focus on how environment affects moral values, but eventually realized that both texts emphasized more on how the transformation of moral values affect one’s environment (community)
    • Wanted to show change in thesis, so wanted exploration of the chosen global issue to develop more in analysis of the second text, The Road, but it seemed really similar to my exploration in If This is a Man
  • Organizing the ten bullet points

 

Good

  • Learning of the context and connecting it to the text and its global issue
  • Connecting two texts and respective authors’ perspectives on the global issue to modern-day situations/context
    • BLM protests, Coronavirus, etc

Beginning Notes

Script

Peer Feedback

Final Shortened Script

TOK Reflection

I think what I’ve taken from TOK the most is questioning the knowledge I have, and the knowledge others have, and its basis for certainty, especially to what extent does faith play a role in our belief in our knowledge. How do we know to trust the sources our knowledge came from? How do we determine the credibility of our sources? Likewise, even if the source is credible, would it not just be faith if we never see the actual phenomenon with our own eyes? Must we use perception to confirm the authenticity of truth? But then, what of areas that cannot be seen?

I don’t think I have fully formed an answer to all of these questions. However, before TOK, I only thought that the credibility of our knowledge only mattered on the sources. I had never thought that faith would play a role in the creation of personal knowledge. TOK has made me really question how anyone can define knowledge solidly.

Atonement: Movie vs Book

  • I think the act of Movie Briony being shown that she has already shared her real name as a nurse to a patient makes the fact she does so with the French soldier less impactful
  • However, it does kind of show that at this stage she is already rebelling against the lack of individuality of the hospital
  • Forgot to write down: Cecilia and Robbie don’t walk with Briony down the station in the movie; instead they are shown making out in their apartment as Briony leaves

Paper 1 Practice Prose: Atonement

scan_jung85326_2020-04-17-15-13-31

Comments:

  • Need to work on time management and grouping concepts; I had a hard time deciding how to outline my essay
  • I don’t think I annotated my extract enough; likewise, I forgot the topic, so I wasn’t particularly focused on annotating the extract to answer the question
  • Teacher’s comments: too repetitive (mentioned “tension” too much) and didn’t qualify what tension meant or what it achieved; didn’t contextualise the extract, so some of the points are confusing; needed to zoom in more
    • I need to remember to mention things outside the extract if they are important in relation to the extract and topic (ie heat)
  • I think I chose a bad extract for me because I’m not sure if I actually understood the techniques used in the extract or how it contributed to building tension

Paper 1 Practice Poem: The Kindness

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1e-Hx1H4BoELZnIMozOJ90tZStB4832D5uxunEcL5ARo/edit?usp=sharing

Comments:

  • Teacher’s comments: Forgot to talk about or mention lineation; sometimes need clarification on points
  • Challenges: deciding on how to organise topics of body paragraphs and relate them to theme of kindness and beauty
  • Personal notes: For body paragraph 3, I should switch the last sentence with the topic sentence because it’s much more clearer whereas my original topic sentence was a bit messy and made more sense after I finished showing all my evidence; I spent around three days planning out and writing the essay, and most of the time went into organising concepts and deciding what evidence to use from my notes and what I should keep out; need to work on time management

Map and The English Patient

– I had a lot of trouble with organizing; I had a lot of ideas and concepts I could spot out and wanted to address, but I didn’t know how to connect them together or how to group them

– I ended up dropping most just to keep it coherent

– I think the first thing I should think about when outlining is my body paragraphs and how I’m categorizing them. As in, am I going “chronologically” by what’s mentioned first? Or am I jumping back and forth the narrative timeline to address general concepts? It’s probably best that it’s a mix of both; group into general concepts but still follow the timeline so I don’t confuse myself and the reader

Sestina

– Keep in mind connotations of words; maintain the vibe

– Got messy near the end; rewrite last two stanzas to make clear what is happening

– Maybe get creative with words and homophones (ie see and sea) to spice things up

– With enjambment, to make things look smoother maybe don’t capitalize words at the beginning of each line