- Examine Medea’s behaviour with Creon: what strategies does she use to manipulate him?
- How does Medea’s speech after Creon’s exit give us further insight into her character?
- What is the thematic function of the choral stasimon after this episode?
- How does Euripides dramatically present the contrast between Medea and Jason’s different perspectives on their relationship?
- What sympathy does the chorus show to Medea? Why?
- How is this dramatically effective?
In the first episode, we encounter Creon and we experience the interaction between both Medea and Creon. Through their interaction, it is very evident that Medea is very cunning and sneaky in the sense that she plays a role and portrays herself in a different light. She plays with the idea that Creon is a father and that he should therefore care for her children, this is coupled by her playing with the idea of being a mother. She elaborates by addressing her close relationship to her children and how she wants the best for them although it is evident from the prologue that she doesn’t really care for them as much as she says.
After Creon exits, we understand what Medea’s intentions are, she ultimately comes to the conclusion that she wishes to kill. Through experiencing Medea as such an unstable character in the prologue, it is feasible to think that this decision may have not had the utmost thought behind it. The chorus thinks in a like-minded way. Although at the end of the prologue, we see the chorus tending to the side of Meda, they still want to check that she is making the right decision. Its almost as if they are checking that she has thought it through enough.
In the second episode, we are introduced to Jason, having very contrasting opinions to one another, Medea’s and Jason’s interaction is a very outstanding point in the play. Initially, Medea states her case and most of her pints of the argument, she generally states the ways in which she feels she had helped Jason on their voyage to get the golden fleece and everything she has done for the relationship. This is then followed by Jason’s side of the argument where he counters everything she says and ultimately finished off by stating how the female’s only purpose is to produce babies and had there been another way to do so they may as well not exist. Through their argument, we understand that on a deeper level, Jason was early in the relationship from a transactional point of view, whilst Medea was very passionate and invested in the relationship.
After this, the second stasimon ultimately suggests how the chorus is coming to the side of Medea. As the chorus mainly consists of Corinthian women, it is understandable as to why they may take Medea’s side more than if it were full of Corinthian men. At the end of this stasimon, the chorus states, “he shall be no friend of mine” ultimately finalising their siding with Medea.