Paper 2 Style Questions – The Handmaid’s Tale & Medea

Discuss the significance of a pivotal moment, shift or turning point in at least two of the works you have studied.

When drawing upon components of both The Handmaid’s Tale and Medea, it is quite clear that some themes do cross over and there are many similarities between the two works. With regards to pivotal moments, shifts or turning points, both texts are different although it is still possible to draw upon connections.

For example, within Medea, one of the critical moments of the play is when Medea has her argument with Jason. This really allows for the audience to not only be exposed to the intensity of the situation but also get a firsthand glimpse at both sides of the argument. When comparing Medea to The Handmaid’s Tale, it is important to consider how the intended audience of Medea ready knew the plot of the play so the actual sequence of events came as less of a surprise. This meant that Euripedes did his best to dramatise what was a classic Greek tragedy.  During this argument, it allowed the audience to potentially side with Medea and sympathise with her, ultimately understanding why she feels the way she does. Similarly, in The Handmaids Tale, towards the end of the story, we experience the “historical notes”. At this point in the book, the audience has more or less fully understood everything about Gilead and what it was like to be there. So much so that they may have even less of an understanding of the real world. Atwood immediately puts this into context by providing a section of the book whereby a lecturer is looking back on past tapes of The Handmaid’s Tale ultimately making it all sound even more ridiculous. Both situations are critical points in both works and do a good job at providing more context to the audience in order for the author to get their point across.

It is quite clear as well, that in The Handmaid’s Tale, a key point is the ceremony. During the ceremony, Offred is seen under the light of her one and true purpose. To reproduce babies – nothing more. It is a very strange situation for everyone involved and I think is done so in such a way that Atwood makes us feel as uncomfortable as possible. In Medea, a key point is when Medea kills her children. Although this is done offstage, it is a very key point in the play – the climax. At this point, we experience a real conversation between her and Jason. It feels like in this situation, Medea and Jason are arguing on a level playing field. In some sense, Medea has a heightened level of power after what shes has done. In The Handmaid’s Tale, to some extent, Offred has a slight bit of power as without her and the rest of the Handmaids, the society would not be able to reproduce. Therefore, in both situations, the protagonists experience heightened levels of power (although they may not realise it).

Medea Fifth Episode and Exodus

Chart the vacillation of Medea in this scene.

The final scene of Medea has been much debated. What are your responses to the ways in which Euripides ends the play?

What are the dramatic and thematic functions of the deus ex machina as denouement?

In the fifth episode, it is very evident how back and forth Medea is, she faces a great deal of internal conflict. On one side, she doesn’t want to hurt her children as, from a mothers point of view, she feels a great deal of connection to them. Although every time she brings Jason into the mix, she realises all of the hate she has for him and why she should follow through with her plan. I think ultimately, this is included in the play to provide the audience with a sense of both sides of the argument. Allowing them to play a similar role to that of the chorus. In addition to this, this internal conflict provides a degree of uncertainty to the audience and leaves them wondering, building up suspense and tension as we begin the exodus.

Part of the debate about the end of the play is formed around Medea’s decision making. Was it right for her as a mother to kill her children to get to Jason’s heart? On one hand, it certainly worked and she definitely got revenge on Jason although, at the same time, she has to face some of the consequences herself which may be very challenging. She also challenges the ideals of what it means to be a mother and more or less betrays all of her family.

At the end of the play, Medea leaves on a chariot that has been sent from her grandfather, the sun god. It is deployed to aid her travel back to the safety of Athens. Many of Euripides play end like this and such an ending allows for very little to be said, both characters merely part their own ways.