Many people think that the ideal job of a journalist is to present a situation objectively. I quite frankly disagree. I believe that that is the job of camera, to record everything exactly as it is, or numbers, to present everything as the data it is. Many people criticise the subjectivity found in journalism but I think that is the essence of it, finding a new angle or perspective on a story and telling people something they don’t already know. I believe that it is literally impossible for a human being to objective. We have our own filters and experiences that make us interpret things the way we do. When you hear about an issue, where you hear about an issue and who tells you also influences the way you respond to it meaning that a journalist doing research is already getting evidence that is tainted in subjectivity.
Another idea we discussed today that I found very interesting is that journalism holds a lot of power against those actually in power. I believe the act of detaining, threatening and harming journalists is actually one of cowardice, because people in power are scared to imagine in what light they will be portrayed. And that itself speaks a lot to the background happenings that many people try to hide. Journalism explores the ideas and information that people have not seen before, and many a times that, for politicians, is information they’ve actively tried to keep in the dark.
I also loved exploring how language can change the meaning of a headline or even the perspective it takes. We looked at how 5 different articles all about the same event and they each made it seem like something different had happened. What I also noticed was that only a few words changed from each headline to the next, and that transformed the connotation entirely. Personally, I think that some headlines can be completely objective, but only a few words will ever satisfy that criteria. Based on the intent of an article/company, they may choose to use a more objective headline or something sensational. It has been found that sensationalist content draws a lot more attention from the media than an article that merely displays the facts, and I don’t find that surprising cause it is in out human nature to read something interesting.