Black Lives Matter Movement – What is my perspective on this issue?

https://time.com/5845752/america-has-its-knee-on-us-george-floyds-death-was-a-breaking-point-protests/

I think there is a lot to think about when it comes to black lives matter movement. There are two sides to the story from my perspective. To me, I feel as though equality is extremely important in today’s modern society, why should there be racism, are we all not the same, do we not operate and live in the same society, are we not given the same opportunities? I think in relation to George Floyd’s unfortunate murder, it was just the tipping point for many people. Many were already on the edge because of numerous police brutality cases, and I think the tragedy just hit many people very hard and caused them to act out. I completely support the black lives matter movement and I stand for it, I have signed petitions, shared links to videos and such petitions, kept up with the news and done my part as an individual. However, I feel as though many people who spread awareness only do it for their own mental stimulation in the sense that they do it to feel good and not cause they actually feel sad or angry from the issue. I must admit by saying I too did this at the start, to feel like I contributed, but then looking over the numerous videos of how crap African-Americans of the United States are being treated truly saddens my heart. However, there is a counter-argument to this, this is an argument that is very valid and which I think is also to be discussed. I understand that many are enraged with the racism going with this issue, but protests are not ideal with a global pandemic situation going on, not only are you putting yourself at a risk but you are putting other people too, which to me is not fair, the chances of spreading are increasing because of this. By risking your country, you are risking other countries too. I support BLM completely, but spreading awareness through violent protests is just not what is meant to be happening right now.

What Songs Matter to You Now? – ELP

What is your favorite song right now? Was it included in the 25 songs list? How did you first hear that song? Did someone share it with you or is it from an artist you follow? What do you love about the song? Are there certain lyrics that you find powerful or moving? Is there something about the beat that you like dancing to? Does the musician’s personality or identity resonate with who you are or how you identify?

Personally, I do not have a favorite song at the moment because I am a fan of most genres in the music industry but one song that I am listening quite often right now is ‘151 rum – JID’, it was not included in the top 25 list as JID is not a well-known rapper however he is one of the most unique artists I have ever encountered in the music industry, he is an artist with an amazing flow and unique lyrics. I heard of him through a friend and I am able to feel connected more with his songs because I can relate to it well. I think the aspect of the song that I love the most is the beat of the song, it is super catchy and there is a sense of culture within the beat. JID’s music isn’t something to dance to but it is rather to embrace, go with the flow and just vibe along with. His personality is shown in his music and it resonated with me because I am able to connect with his music well and I can feel the same flow of energy with the artist.

 

 

 

How Can We Help One Another During the Coronavirus Outbreak?

Article – How can we help one another during the coronavirus outbreak? What can you, your friends, family, and community do to look out for one another?

Coronavirus outbreak has brought the world to its knees, especially the US and the entirety of Europe. But how are we handling it? The majority of the world population is taking a common measure of social distancing in an attempt to avoid and prevent the spread of the virus. Personally, I think it is definitely effective, there is nothing better than being able to prevent the spread of the virus and eliminating the chance of more cases, however, there are some opposing arguments regarding it. In the article, it talks about how we are stronger united than divided. I think that in the case of the pandemic, it is important to self-isolate and quarantine even though it is a human’s natural instinct to interact with others around them. I generally agree with the claim and respect Serrano’s efforts to form a supportive environment and be there for each other in times of need however from a practical side of things, self-isolation is the way to go with minimal contact except for instant family. I think it is important to help others I need, in the US almost 6 million people have lost their jobs and they are not able to financially support their family hence I think it is our responsibility to try and help others by donating food supply or offering assistance to the vulnerable, we can still help even if we are not directly there.

Is It Immoral to Increase the Price of Goods During a Crisis? – ELP

Does high demand for items like hand sanitizer and masks during a public health crisis justify higher prices? Are resellers who stockpile supplies and then sell them at a higher price providing a service? Or, are they taking advantage of people? Do you think what Mr. Colvin did is immoral?

I would like to express my personal opinion on this sensitive subject in the world right now, but I will also like to explain the reality of this situation. Personally, I think when the world is in a very desperate situation with the COVID-19 pandemic, it is greedy to take this as an advantage and sell high demand goods such as hand sanitizer and masks in order to make a large number of earnings. However, as an economics student, in reality, the high demand goods can bring in a lot of revenue for a producer and there is a large profit incentive established here. With that being said, though it is selfish, I would also consider it a smart thing to do because, in the modern ages, money is a driving factor that keeps the world developing. I think it is particularly greedy if you are taking advantage of the lower class of society as they may not be able to afford it in the retail price, and if the price is increased the situation only worsens for them. With that being said, I think Mr. Colvin’s action is immoral but smart.

ELP – Newspaper Article Analysis

https://www.thejakartapost.com/academia/2019/09/16/smoking-kills-and-funds.html

Title & Date of the Article: ‘Smoking kills and funds’ on September 16th, 2019 at 8:50 am

Summary of the article: The main purpose of this article is to inform that the Indonesian government plans to raise the indirect tax on cigarettes by 23% excise hike tax which would raise the retail price of each pack of cigarettes by 35 %. By increasing the indirect tax of this demerit good (goods that harmful or unhealthy for an individual or society as a whole), the government hopes that the rate of consumption is reduced as it causes a negative externality (effect) to society.

I think this is the main purpose of the article because the article starts with a large photograph of cigarettes where the caption states “An average 23 percent excise hike will increase retail cigarette prices by 35 percent, according to the Finance Ministry, after keeping the tobacco excise steady in the 2019 election year”.

The tone of the article makes it seem like the article is informing the readers and alerting them to be cautious of how the demerit good affects society negatively. The article also seems like it wants the readers to know that they are trying to reduce all of this, by increasing the indirect tax, so to the readers (ones who are smokers or have family or friends who smoke) in a more difficult situation.

What are the techniques employed?

  • The headline of the article ” Indonesia to raise cigarette prices by more than a third at the start of 2020″ which effectively draws the attention of the readers as this article aims to alert the smokers (consumers) about the increase in tax & how this will affect them as the price would increase which would naturally increase the burden on each smoker as they have to pay more.
  • Another skill the author used is the formal and unique style of language. Due to this type of language, it keeps the article very engaging and in line with the topic so that readers don’t deviate off-topic. This shows the readers that the article is to be seen in a professional manner and worth reading for valuable information.
  • One last technique is the use of visuals but I personally do not think that it served too well as it did not have any real effect on the aim of the article. I think more visuals that have a more powerful message can be used, possibly pictures of cardiovascular diseases which is caused by smoking.
  1. Excise Tax –  Excise taxes are taxes paid when purchases are made on a specific good, such as gasoline. Excise taxes are often included in the price of the product.
  2. Cardiovascular diseases – Cardiovascular diseases are conditions that affect the structures or function of your heart.
  3. Impact – a marked effect or influence.

 

Women Stereotypes

This is not a photograph I took, but this is one I found that goes against the stereotypes. This is going against a stereotype because usually in older times, and even now in the modern era, people think a woman’s place & role in society is by her husband who is symbolized as the man of the house, & they are usually portrayed as the person who runs the household by doing her chores and keeping everything in place. Even now, women are often visualized as soft & tender, and that they are not fit for the bigger aspects of life, such as jobs and life decisions. But in this photograph, we can see a woman who would naturally be seen as a bodybuilder, and she breaks the stereotype because she is portrayed as big and strong and not the usual which says a woman is soft and tender. If there are more women like her who can stand up to these stereotypes then change will be able to occur in the modern world.

Language & Advert

 

In this photo, the left side of this photo shows a girl in the traditional Indian girl make-up, dress, and long hair. The left shows the ‘Sanskari’ side of a woman. The term ‘sanskari’ is an Indian term used to describe an Indian girl who follows all her family values and traditions, more specifically Indian related ones. The right side shows that the girl makes herself look like a boy by cutting her hair short and do different make-ups. This shows how girls are forced to conform with societal norms by portraying themselves “male-like” just to have equal rights and benefits such as education. By doing this, it shows how women are forced to create an image that suits and adapts to the unfairness of the society they live in, they are put in a situation where they feel uncomfortable and happy due to how they are expected to live. In a way, the left side of the photo also challenges the role and identity of women as it shows how women are expected to act as ‘Sanskari’ whilst the right side of the photo shows how women have to conform to the way society makes them too. The darker colored background on the right side suggests that it is painful & unfair for the women to have to ‘change genders’ in order to receive inequality for factors such as education, jobs, etc. 

This advertisement aims to prevent people from judging women based on what they wear. The ad portrays how there is a stereotype that as more skin of a short is exposed, you are more likely to look down upon women. The message the advert wants to send out is men should not judge women and that it is alright for anyone to dress however they want. As the length of clothing does not indicate your social status in society as a whore, slut or a person ‘who is asking for it’. The audience is the ladies affected by this problem and along with men who see this not a problem. The advert focuses on changing the mindset of men who think of this as not a problem as well as make women feel inclusive as they are not alone when they see this as a problem. Rather a group of strong women with a strong stand against judgemental men.

Analysis Of Two Different Print Advertisements Of Two Cultures

The above advertisement is from the care brand company called dove. In this ad, dove wants to advertise their new body wash that is meant to help one gain clearer and smoother skin. As stated within the ad itself, with dove’s creme de body wash there is “visibly more beautiful skin from the most unexpected of places – your shower”. However, this ad received a large amount of backlash as it implied the idea “black women are not beautiful and white women are beautiful”, hence the before and after effect. In the ad, the facial expressions of the women would ideally suggest they are happy with the way things are portrayed, but intuition to me suggests that the black woman has “accepted her fate” as she is portrayed as the “ugly and before factor” and that the smile on her is a way to cover up what she is truly feeling. Black discrimination of women happens mainly in the United States of America where this idea of white dominance sprang up around 1619. Now in modern times, though the amount of discrimination has gone down, there are still occasions such as this one where many have unknowingly done this. There are two ways to look at this, Dove is a care brand company that wishes to represent the diversity of real beauty and they have core beliefs that all women are beautiful, hence they had no intentions of any discrimination of black women. However, what the ad wrongfully portrayed is a mistake occurred by the marketing team of Dove.

 

The above advertisement is from ‘Sisley’ which is a line from the luxurious Italian fashion company called Benetton group. In this ad, Sisley wants to advertise how dashing their fashion line, so much to the point it becomes “addictive” for everyone. However, the advertisement received a lot of backlashes. The portrayal of “Addiction” in this ad is referring to fashion but with the facial expression and actions of the people within the ad, this implies drugs such as cocaine. The act of ‘Snorting’ the clothes can be seen as something that is very harmful because of unprescribed drugs are very harmful to people. Personally, I feel that almost every culture would see this advertisement as offensive because of the rather odd way of representing clothing and associating this with drug use. Another minor aspect as to how this might be an offensive ad is because the clothing shown is from Italy which is then combined with this idea of addiction which implies that Italian fashion is the best and not other styles of fashion. The advertisement is aimed at showing people what type of variety ‘Sisley’ provides. But the approach to the advertisement is what caused the severe backlash.

WHO OWNS CULTURE?

Who owns culture? 

 

A culture is a group of people who share common characteristics and knowledge about lifestyle. This usually consists of factors such as language, food, social habits, music, arts, films, etc. In my personal opinion, I do not think that anyone owns a culture, but I see it as rather a group of values and traditions shared by a common set of people. No one rightfully owns a culture, it can be fair to say that there are few people who help develop the culture. If one is to disrespect a culture, the people within the culture have all the rights to take action against them. In that sense, the people within a culture have the authority of how culture is to be portrayed and how it needs to be respected. This applies to each and every culture, where there are certain rules and regulations that need to be respected. Since no one really owns a culture, it is often difficult to modernize or change the dynamics of any culture and no one possesses the real authority to change anything. Any development of culture is a group decision that takes time to adapt. No one should be allowed to ‘own’ a culture because then it simply becomes a group of people that follow traditions and values created by one individual with no meaning.