Dear mathematicians and scientists in my English class

Posted on

You sit there thinking, this is the very antithesis of all I stand for. It is all fluffy and vague and subjective and, to be honest, not at all interesting.

I hear you. And yes, to some extent, you are absolutely right. Well maybe not absolutely. Because, let’s face it: only a sith deals in absolutes.

See? Sci-fi allusion! I’ve got fi, you’ve got the sci… we’ll meet halfway.

If you could open your curious scientific and mathematical minds, you will see that the study of English language and literature is your new favourite subject you haven’t quite given a chance yet.

You see:

 

  1. Studying language and literature needs critical thinking. When we analyse texts, we look at all the pieces of evidence and we try to piece together a cogent essay to seek out the author’s intent. Easier said than done. When was the last time you did something with full intent, let alone understand someone else’s? Piecing together context and linguistic DNA, we are the CSI after the explosion of something so creative and far-reaching. This is no subject for weak-wristed sentimentality. It needs a crack team of clear thinkers who understand how language, context, and structure work.
  2. Studying language and literature needs mental stamina. Much like your admired scientific and mathematical geniuses, linguists and literary students go back and redraft their theories on a particular text. They reflect on wrong assumptions, they edit and edit and edit and edit – until their work is, in a word, elegant.
  3. Studying language and literature needs research and curiosity. One of our resolutions in class this year is to read. Read widely, read deeply, read often. Because reading literature and studying language is only partly decoding. It is also about knowledge. And that, my fellow philosophos is where our Venn diagram meets. What you love is what you should also love about this subject. It is that endless pursuit of knowledge to gain truth.

With kind affection,

Mrs. Wiseman


Say it ain’t so…

Posted on

What do you infer from these headlines? (After reading the headlines, what do you think is the purpose of this new federal government office?)

 

Many people just read the headlines. Some read the headline and first paragraph of a news story. How does the first paragraph from the following change your understanding about the purpose of VOICE? (What false impression did the headlines give you about the Trump administration’s view of all immigrants?)

 

“Stymied on his top immigration initiatives, President Donald Trump is making good on one plan that critics denounce as fearmongering and misleading: opening an office for victims of crimes committed by immigrants, although studies show immigrants are less likely to commit crimes than native-born citizens.”

 

I used the activity above which I found in Student Daily News was very helpful in identifying bias in media, as well highlighting the responsibility of journalists vis-a-vis the economic reality of newspapers dying in the digital age.

I found myself in this uncomfortable position of putting the newspapers I read on trial and finding them guilty of bias and… to some extent, clickbait.

But I think this is still the best way for students to learn something new. To unlearn their old way of thinking. Something should spring up at them, a complete surprise.

That I myself experience this surprise, surely is a bonus. Not a glitch.