Initial TOK Practice Presentation thinking
Initial notes and thoughts for the presentation:
- knowledge question <-> real-life situation
- supported by arguments, different perspectives
- The outcome of the analysis(answer to the KQ) is significant to the RLS (and others)
- Talk about the concepts rather than real-life details
- Do not use something that is interesting just because it is currently in the news.
- (but things in the news are interesting …… !)
- Example knowledge questions: Are aesthetic values universal? Does the labeling of individuals determine our perceptions? Can language ever be neutral? To what extent can models accurately represent the real world?
Real-life situation 1: Hongkong Protest (people’s reaction to it)
- The protest became violent
- link it to other protests
- should the protest be encouraged? allowed? Are there alternative methods?
- there’s a lot of perspectives to be discussed in this issue
- utilitarian perspective: does it achieve the goal? What is the pay-off? (somewhat yet unknown)
- duty ethic: people have the right to protest.
- Reasoning: violence is bad. protest creates violence. protests are bad. Counterclaim: protests are aimed to be non-violent.
- How do people have the perspective that they have? education, media, shared knowledge, past events(history), personal choice. Link to ways of knowing.
- Should lead to a conclusion that people are not going to agree. There’s no way one side can convince the other, simply because the way people think is completely on two separate tracks.
- Realizing that fact might help to provide some peace. (On the internet we can see lots of unnecessary quarrels/conflicts. )
- Is it possible for people to maintain peaceful discussions and basic understanding while having opposite opinions? possibly link to a whole lot of other situations.
- Ethics. human science(?)
Real-life situation 2: some people still believe that the Earth is flat
- natural science. religion(?)
- personal knowledge vs shared knowledge
- “Earth is round” is accepted as fact. evidence, reasoning. the concept of truth in science.
- Talk about the paradigm shift.
- The social context then compared to now.
- In “personal knowledge”, it’s much easier to “prove” that Earth is flat rather than round.
- Logical fallacy.
- While most people don’t have it as personal knowledge, some people do not accept the shared knowledge but some others do. Why?
- Authority. distrust. imagination. memory. personal experience and hearing from others.
- People tend to believe the claim that they know first.
- To change their belief means admitting that they were wrong. Reluctant to do that because of emotion.
- Does not believe in scientific fact makes someone “stupid”? Or just means they think differently?
- Does it make the claim less true? Is “truth” objective or subjective?
Real-life situation 3: my service with disabled children
- we are constantly trying to find a balance between treating them as normal people and accomodating to their special needs, which is difficult.
- How do we know how to behave when with different people?
- WOK: language. emotion. intuition.
- AOK: human science