A scientific theory is, in my opinion, more important than a scientific law. I believe this is so because a scientific theory can lead to finding so much more new evidence and making many more connections than a scientific law can; what I mean by this is that, once we figure out a law and model it using a mathematical equation, that law is fixed and we cannot change it. Very little or no new information can be found from this law now that we consider it a law and have been able to model it mathematically. A theory, on the other hand, is open to more speculation; using evidence from a theory, we can find so many more connections in the scientific world and draw so many more predictions which may result in the creation of more theories. In my opinion, I believe that debating theories lead to the creation of more and the finding of more evidence; therefore, it is my opinion that a scientific theory is more important than a scientific law.
Which is more important: a scientific law or a scientific theory?
Video Player
00:00
00:00