Posted in ELP

Top Girls

Q) Explain how Churchill uses language to establish a particular character’s identity, class, or social status. First, decide on a character, then analyze the specific language selected by Churchill for this particular character. Include direct quotes and dramatic techniques. Remember to consider both representation and identity in your response. Respond in paragraph form.

The character I have chosen is Dull Gret. In Top Girls, Churchill uses language as an indicator of class status and how women were oppressed at that time. Churchill makes Dull Great a stark contrast to everyone else at the dinner table by making her the quiet and silent one who doesn’t talk much until the very end. When Gret does eventually decide to join the conversation, the way her narrative changes is striking. I think the reason Churchill does this is to show how women at that time had a lot to say and a lot of emotion that they wanted to express but were told to keep quiet and not talk just like how Dull Gret was in the beginning. Talking about her main speech at the end where Gret describes her struggles, I think that Churchill wants to portray how Gret had gone “into hell” and fight the “devils” (devils being men in this scenario) to fight against this system where men were dominating. Churchill shows how women had been constructed to have a particular ‘voice’ or ‘identity’ and therefore uses Gret to show how women tried to fight back against this. Through the story that Gret tells, Churchill wants to show that even though they were all going through horrific times the women were able to fight the “devils” (men) and also beat them.

Posted in Uncategorized

Reflection on the Arts Aards

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

What would I change in the award and why?

The first thing that I would change is our Eligibility age. The restrictions that we had given for age did not include people over the age of 35 and a lot of people thought that was unfair. people over 35. The reason why we had chosen to not include people over the age of 35 was that we did not think putting up a 10-year-old against a 40-year-old was fair. However, to maybe solve this issue there could be age categories.

What did you realize about others’ awards? Questions you might raise?

So, a main problem throughout all the awards that was common was that we were finding it difficult to measure “emotion”. Good art is normally connected with the idea that it makes the recipients “feel emotion.” However, many times people have different responses to the same piece of artwork. So then how do we know if the Art achieved its purpose?

Another problematic area that often came up was about judges. How do we make sure that we have the right panel of judges? Is there such a thing as “an expert”? should only experts be allowed to judge a competition? If we make it about popularity within the public, will the vote be more biased than the one from judges? Questions like this lead us back to the main question – What exactly is “good” art.