Hannah Hoch’s ‘Abduction’ – Applying Global Issue Cards

Hannah Hoch | Kunst ideen, Fotomontage, Hannah höch

Hannah Hoch’s ‘Abduction’ 1935

 

Representation: Culture, community and identity

The piece ‘Abduction’ is a photomontage which is part of the collection of ‘From an ethnographic museum’, presented through the artistic form of collages of contemporary European women and ‘primitive’ sculptures or tribal objects. This work of art, produced by Hannah Hoch, challenges social gender roles and racial stereotypes. As this collection was created from the time period of 1924 to 1930, it is assumed that Hoch alludes to changing gender roles of that time described as ‘The New Woman’ and employs the artistic style of Dadaism, both of which emerged from the political, social and economic chaos during the Weimar Republic post WW1.

Through the piece ‘Abduction’, Hoch challenges the portrayal of ‘primitive’ colonized African cultures, as well as draws parallels between Western female identity. The re-contextualisation of the tribal artefacts and sculptures are seen as a reflection of German racial superiority and Western stereotypical views of various parts of Africa. This is seen through the central and large positioning of the wood sculpture from Congo, originally captioned ‘Abduction of the Virgins’, and serves to portray cultural stereotypes of savagery and sexualisation/exploitation of Congolese women. Furthermore, the red contrasting trees in the background originally taken from a magazine for Malaria cures may be a symbol of disease and danger, another stereotype associated to the phrase ‘Dark Continent’, a derogatory term used by colonizers to describe Sub Saharan Africa as result of lack of knowledge which formed perceptions such as its interior being mysterious and dangerous. However, Hoch challenges these Western perceptions through the juxtaposition of a caucasian female head overlapping a face on the wooden sculpture and facing the opposite direction. This jarring composition which disrupts the symmetry of the tribal figures challenges the scientific ‘truth’ of ethnic and gender stereotypes presented by ethnographic museums. Moreover, this incongruous hybrid technique disorders the illusion of an aesthetically pleasing figure. Just as women in Africa depicted by the German’s were seen to be sexual assets, Hoch also challenges the same discourse in German culture, specifically the ideal beauty standard which emerged from the ‘New Woman’, and ultimately, how women in different cultures are repressed in different forms. 

Creativity: Art, creativity and the imagination

Through the piece ‘Abduction’, Hoch uses distortion to challenge the characteristics of primitivism in the European avant-garde style Dadaism. Where ‘primitive’ art was often used an as inspiration for works under the style of Dadaism, Hoch challenges this idealization and romanticization of non-Western people and cultures portrayed as ‘primitive’. The use of dark, contrasting colours and superimposition distorts the symmetry of the piece and the original sculpture, which present the overall piece as mismatched and clashing. While the caucasian face alludes to the ‘New Woman’ and is a symbol of respect and admiration in Western culture, the sculpture and artefacts connote racist stereotypes and exploitation. It also displays the dichotomies of natural and artificial or rational and irrational, reflective of the post WW1 period where the European’s embraced technological advancement and industrialisation, moving toward secularisation and rationalised economies. When combined, the different elements depict both the ‘primitive’ and contemporary societal structures which constrain gender roles and restrain female identity. Rather than romanticising ‘primitive’ art, Hoch uses it to ridicule and expose European colonialism as well as the political, social and economic chaos post WW1. 

What is Conflict?

In these couple of lessons, we looked at conflict – trying to define what it is, what it means to experience it, sources of where it can stem from, and analysing other conflicts in the world. Here we did a couple of activities (analysing images, having mini debates, simple rock, paper, scissors or arm wrestle games) to try and discuss the different viewpoints and lenses to which both sides can see things from.

We also lined up on a spectrum based on how much we agreed/disagreed to the statement ‘conflict is always good’. This visually displayed how much we varied as a group in terms of opinions, with some people on the more extreme ends and people in the middle scattered throughout. I personally felt more in the middle, leaning toward the side in support of the statement, since I saw conflict as a way to challenge tradition, norms, ideologies – and by doing so, helps voice new ideas and encourages creativity and development. I think one of the biggest misconceptions about conflict is that it always has to be violent or physically destructive. And this is where we regrouped and discussed how we actually define conflict and where it stems from.

Most interestingly, we learnt about the different types of violent – and that violence itself is not always physical. Although it is most often direct (examples being torture, war, destruction, hate speech, bombing), it can also be structural and cultural, and occur in a variety of domains (from personal all the way to global). 

 

We specifically looked at an example of conflict – the controversy surrounding the movie Crazy Rich Asians. We read a review from Sangeetha Thanapal, and she brought up criticism of the movie’s exclusion of minorities in Singapore, only featuring Chinese cast, although set in Singapore, a multiracial country.

I thought it was quite fascinating to discuss how media and Hollywood play such an essential role in representation and shaping social, cultural norms. Especially since racism is such a prevalent issue and occurs worldwide on different scales – for instance, the media was an important platform for the BLM movement and its ability to reach different countries all over the world.