My IO was based on an Eli Rezkallah piece, which in itself is a parody of a coffee ad of the 1950s. It went okay, but I feel like there were points where my ideas were not structured well, and I stuttered a lot
My IO was based on an Eli Rezkallah piece, which in itself is a parody of a coffee ad of the 1950s. It went okay, but I feel like there were points where my ideas were not structured well, and I stuttered a lot
It went okay? If you don’t want to take the time to really think about your strengths and weaknesses, should I?
A:5, B:5, C:6 D:7
Could you be more precise in the intro. An add for what? What is happening in it?
When you are analytically describing the image – what text? What clothing? What furniture (you could call the latter two the mise-en-scene). HOW is the threat created?
Often, the response doesn’t really explain the effect of anything – rather it is just described. What impact does the inversion have? Why is he using it? What is being satirised?
Yes, I do think that I missed out on some of the key images seen in the image as mentioned (clothing, posture, even the furniture, giving it a period feel which I omitted from my IO). I do also feel that my points were all over the place, and even though I attempted to structure them, they lacked a bit of content in terms of in depth analysis.
For the next IO, I’ll try to add more micro/macro analysis, as it was lacking in quite a few areas.