Global issue: in what ways can a political of power affect one’s willingness to consider conflicting ideas.
literary text: The Intoxicated by Shirley Jackson
Non-literary text: twitter from Donald J. Trump
Today I am going to talk about how does a different political power can affect one’s willingness to consider conflicting ideas in The intoxicated by Shirley Jackson and a twitter from Donald J. Trump.
First, I am going to talk about the literary text: the intoxicated. The man in the short story was having a conversation with the host’s daughter in the kitchen when he escaped from the party hoping to get sober. From their conversation, we can see that the way this girl behaves and talks is very different from what the man used to do when he was young, and this man does not support this change of thinking and behavior in younger generation. When the man was young “girls thought about cocktails and necking and nothing else” this suggest that during the time we he was young, girls or even all youngsters are not motivated and doing things that benefiting themselves or society which is contrasting to the young girl here. By the fact that the man repeated the sentence girl thought “cocktails and necking and nothing else’ for twice, this seem to suggest that in his conscious, he believe the girls nowadays should do so too. This is also a irony in which girls in the past are hanging out and do nothing everyday while the host’s daughter in the age of 17 already begin to think about the future of world. The difference in behaviors during young age is foreshadowing the dissonance of their ideas in the end of the story. Unlike a normal girl in the modern life, the girl in the story’s prediction of the future is not happy and wealthy, but a tragedy. “All the big apartment houses by the river, slipping down slowly into the water with people inside.” “Maybe we in our Latin class will be the last people who ever read Caesar.” From her description of the future world, it is more like a process of destruction. This seems to imply that the current world is not working well enough to to make a girl believe things will get better. The man became unsettled gradually as the girl keep describing the details of the future, he said “ I think it’s a little silly for you to fill your mind with all these morbid trash. Buy yourself a movie magazine and settle down.” The man denied the girls’s idea about the future, he thinks that idea is come from youth foolishness. “ He wanted badly to say something adult and scathing, and yet he was afraid of showing her that he had listened too her.” This suggests the girl’s idea made this man speechless, but he has a typical stereotype that the adult has more power than a child and the adult should be always dominant in a conversation, therefore he wants to say something scathing to become dominant, and he afraid to show that he had listened because he does not want the girl to know that he is listening and respect her ideas because of his belief of his higher social position.
Then I will talk about the non literary text of Trump’s twitter regarding the young girl Greta Thunberg. Greta Thunberg became the front cover of the magazine Person of the Year because of her huge accomplishment on raising awareness of climate change. Donald Trump sent a twitter in response to this. His tone of commenting this was mocking, and showed his scorn attitude. This is evidenced in when Donald Trump said “ So ridiculous!”, the strong offensive diction that he used to react of Greta’s achievement. He use the exclamation mark to emphasis his strong feelings. The use of these two words We’re not only denied young Greta’s achievement, but also the ideas of climate change as well. Donald Trump also said “ Greta must work on her anger management problem.” This is referring to Greta always uses a straightforward speaking manner and he is suggesting Greta to “ chill” . In the end of Donald Trump’s twitter, he said :” go to a good old fashioned movie with a friend!” He is suggesting some stereotypical things that most of teenage girls are doing, because Greta is doing things that is so different —- raising awareness for climate change—- which Donald Trump does not believe, so he thinks she should give up what she is doing and be a ordinary girl. Donald Trump believes things like climate change does not exist, so when young Greta is putting so much effort to wok on it, it seems nonsense and even waste of time to Donald Trump, therefore he suggest some ordinary thing in order to convince her to stop working on climate change. Donald Trump as the president of America, his age and political position is way more higher than young Greta, so when Greta was trying to bring something new to the public eyes, it is hard for Donald Trump to believe what a kid is saying. A common stereotypical thinking is when a man gets older, he is more experienced and knowledgeable, so what he says is correct and youngsters should be obey what they said.
In conclusion, even though the creation of two texts are 70 years apart, but the context of them are surprisingly similar: both of the main character are not willing to accept ideas from a young girl, because both men have more experience and knowledge, so the brand new ideas proposed by a kid is hard for them to believe what they are saying, also they do not want to lower their social status and the fact that they are more experienced and knowledgeable, so to listen to a kid is sounding embarrassing and awkward for them. According to the non literary text Donald Trump’s twitter and the literary text The Intoxicated, two men are unwilling to accept the idea from a child because their stereotypical belief of the younger ones should always be obeying what the older said.