Historical Notes Analysis

 

What is the function of the historical notes?

  • Provide closure to Offred’s story
  • Give insight into how the regime worked, its structures, systems, etc. more so than Offred just herself (a handmaid) could provide
  • To make it clear that Giliead eventually ended, society recovered, and now people just study it in the future
  • To show how these misogynistic attitudes remain far into the future, even though the Giliead is no longer a republic
  • Atwood wants us to keep thinking and examining consequences and implications of this novel – “are there any questions”

What additional information is provided?

  • We receive information about how the society evolved out of the Giliead Regime, and how future generations perceive the events that Offred describes in the novel
  • How Offred’s story and the history was apparently convoluted and the evidence may be interpreted in multiple ways
  • How the Sons of Jacob established Giliead as a republic, e.g religious justification, virus, infertility

What might be problematic about this section of the novel?

  • The keynote speaker is biased, “impartial”, and has chauvinist values
  • They are posing problems about the authentic and genuine story we have just read, they think it is flawed, but they aren’t really considering the very personal and emotional experience that Offred has shared
  • They are annoyed with Offred’s way of communicating, no interest in who she actually is, the main interest is who the Commander might be

How is this section of the novel both an epilogue, a warning, and a critique?

  • They seem to empathize with Giliead
  • Warning that even though Giliead had risen and fallen, people still may hold misogynistic values (which can be apparent in the casual sexist remarks), diminishing all of the pain and torment that all the women went through. It is shown that  this future has pretty much not learned anything
  • The fact that the audience laughs at the sexist jokes shows that it is accepted and normal
Posted in

Serena Joy

What role has she played in establishing Gilead as a republic? What is the significance of her character in the novel?

Serena Joy is the wife of Commander Waterford, the individual that uses Offred to produce children. She used to be somewhat of a celebrity before the sons of Jacob took over the regime, advocating for the extreme conservative ideologies that women should stay at home and serve their husbands, helping establish Gilead as a republic. She is representative of the ‘Virtuous Woman’ from the Old Testament, which can be described as the females who were content with being subjugated to marginalization, fulfilling their only purpose that is to follow their husband’s orders. Atwood creates her character to satirize the ‘Christian Right Wives’ from the 1980s that competed against the fight for gender equality, defending anti-abortion.

  • Even though she is very powerful, she still feels quite trapped and betrayed as she one of the key architects of Gilead
  • She is bitter and frustrated, and she takes that out on those around her
  • She feels the need to put herself above Offred to compensate for her distress
  • Shows that its not just men oppressing women as women also hold these values

She is quite a prominent figure in the Handmaid’s tale given Offred’s many frequent visits to her Commander, seeing her up close. She discusses her name, how it sounds the company title of a luxurious shampoo product: “with a woman’s head in cut-paper silhouette on a pink oval background with scalloped gold edges”. 

Posted in

HandMaid’s Tale: Notes on the Body

In what ways is the control of women’s bodies reflective of the totalitarian control of the regime in Gilead?

The control of women’s bodies is blatantly reflective of the totalitarian control of the regime in Gilead; it acts as this form of this ‘extreme dictatorship’ that controls all aspects of life, justifying their actions, laws, punishments, on a specific interpretation of the bible. In the Handmaid’s tale, essentially every privilege a female could have is stripped away from them, they are banned from reading, not in control of their sex lives or bodies, and they are reminded of this constantly. For example, the bodies of doctors were executed and hanged for the women to see due to their actions of performing abortions of women, portraying how giving women the ability to control their lives in this society is a horrifying crime. This extreme control is also evident in Chapter 13 where Offred describes her situation: “Each month I watch for blood, fearfully, for when it comes it means failure”. Here, this quote shows how Offred greatly fears her period as the only function she serves to this society is to reproduce, and when she fails, she is labeled as a ‘failure’ – she is essentially useless and a waste of space.

The totalitarian regime in the setting of the Handmaid’s Tale is strongly based on the Old Testament, acting as a theocracy where this single religion dominates all aspects of life, including what they think. The Old Testament can be characterized as chaotic and fearful, where humans need to work hard and pray for all their lives until they can finally enjoy the afterlife once they die. The Puritans were a group of ‘ultra-conservatives that advocated these ideologies, believing that women and entertainment were a distraction and should be hidden. We see remnants and reflections of this group of people through geographical clues and language in the Handmaid’s tale. For example, the names of people’s categories (Angels, Guardians of Faith, Commanders of the Faith, etc.) are all biblical terms portraying the vast influence of the religion onto the regime in Gilead. 

Posted in

Saint Hoax Consolidation

Saint hoaxing takes old US advertisements and reconstructs them. These art pieces are quite heteroglossia (ambiguous) they contain the voice of the vintage advertisement, the voice of Donald Trump, and the voice of Saint Hoax.

One of his art campaigns is titled ‘Making America Mysoginistic Again’.

What are the issues represented in this art campaign?

Misogyny = hating women. A lot more deep-seated and aggressive as compared to just being sexist – it’s a strong distrust and dislike of women.

About Trump: Anachronistic values: he’s insecure, and feels the need to constantly demonstrate his “manliness” or dominance, unlike Obama who is confident in his identity. Trump characterizes other men as ‘losers’ or ‘wimps’ to protect his ego. Trump disregards females as human beings which are seen through his language. There’s a connection between his reference of women and his position of power,  maybe a symbol of equality moving backward

“He didn’t invent this dichotomy, he simply expanded and exploited it” This shows how he uses such language in order to instill already existing stereotypes on women. Trump does not validate females as humans which can be seen with how he talks about them using animalistic wording

He is surrounded by women especially in his family, but he tends to talk about them as “pretty” and “slim” and anything outside of that isn’t good enough. I guess he “celebrates” women only in the physical sense…

Marked terms e.g Indian Doctor, woman doctor, not always offensive but it is with cases like Trump who constantly categorizes people. He doesn’t like to be challenged and refuses to answer questions.

What does it mean to be a president?
Trump’s ‘locker room’ talk is very dangerous as he is now the president of one of the most feminist places. The president is meant to embody the values of a country. It represents the people of America and develops diplomatic relations. Obama did a pretty good job of that abroad, being able to negotiate, while Trump tended to alienate.

Presentation

Analysis of his work

Posted in

Chapter 8 + 9 Notes

Chapter 8 – the tragedy

George goes to kill Gatsby, believing he was having an affair with his wife, as well as to seek revenge for the person that killed his wife in a car accident. (It was Gatsby’s car that killed Myrtle)

“Savage, frightening dreams”

Three major deaths: Myrtle, Gatsby and Wilson. Like Greek Tragedy, all the deaths occur off stage. Nick is the ideal person to narrate these off-stage deaths.

“A thin red circle in the water” Gatsby’s blood flows into the pool, making the shape of a circle. This suggests the story goes full circle? Significance of pool – baptism?

“Holocaust” did not share same connotations as it does today, yet still remains a tragedy. It is not a tragedy of the Jazz Age. It is a tragedy of missed communication, corruption, unrealistic dreams, ego/self belief? Small scale tragedy – everybody moves on. But it stays in the memory of Nick (and the readers) forever.

Chapter 9

https://www.massolit.io/courses/fitzgerald-the-great-gatsby/chapter-9

Key ideas:

Two years in the future (retrospective – impact on story?)

Nick quotes the death of Wilson as being “a man deranged by grief” – simplifies the true motivations. It’s Nick’s duty to tell the tale, that’s why he wrote this novel. But has he reported it honestly? Not really.

Daisy, Tom, and all the other characters disappeared in order to preserve their reputation, only concerned about themselves.

Nick talking about Tom and Daisy “they smashed up things and creatures and then retreated back into their money or their vast carelessness” this sums up the kind of society Fitzgerald represented in the Great Gatsby. They all didn’t care.

This brings up the idea of responsibility. It seems as if these people did not have any responsibilities. Myrtle, Wilson, and Gatsby died as a result. Life wasn’t sacrosanct, it was unimportant, meaningless, lost.
This makes Nick’s job of telling a meaningful, truthful story harder.

“One of the taxi drivers in the village never took a fare past the entrance gate without stopping for a minute and pointing inside”. After his death, Gatsby is now the object of stories and rumours. Nick wonders if the taxi driver has his own story of the event, but shortly after refuses to consider it: “I didn’t want to hear it and I avoided him when I got off the train”
This suggests that Nick doesn’t want to hear any other version of the story except the version he made up.
We are also getting introduced to the idea that there could be multiple angles to this story

“One night I did hear a material car there… But I didn’t investigate” – he hears the car, he sees the lights, but he doesn’t investigate. Contradiction: He’s narrating, he’s not telling. “Sold his car to the grocer” is meaningless.

“Huge incoherent, failure of a house” summaries Gatsby – the house, the place, represents who he aspires to be

“On the white steps an obscene word, scrawled by some boy with a piece of brick, stood out clearly in the moonlight, and I erased it, drawing my show raspingly along the stone”
White: purity
What is the obscene word? Why tell us if it’s just going to be erased? What is the purpose of it?
Supposition of ‘some boy’ vague, generalised description
You can’t see it fully but you can see that it is there. This sums up the character of Nick Carraway and how he tells the story, highlighting something but then taking it away (unreliable narrator)

Towards the end of the chapter:
“Inessential houses”
“Gatsby believed in the green light, the orgastic future that year by year recedes before us” The green light means go, green springs of the future, it has many positive connotations. But here the colour green is questioned.
“It eluded us then” – the whole thing is an elusion. Everything that Gatsby and Nick wanted.
“And one fine morning – “ America still believes it can be something in the future.

This novel suggests that the famous American dream is fake and corrupted, but at the same time leads America into some kind of future.

Significance of symbolic patterning?
Retains the idea of the American dream

Posted in

Chapter 7 Notes

Chapter 7

After the failure of communication that was the end of chapter 6, is a chronicle of Death Foretold

“Obscurely, his career as Trimalchio was over” – only mention of Trimalchio in the full novel. Trimalchio: ‘the great gormandizer, the great nouveau riche arriviste, the great hedonist’ He wasn’t even Trimalchio. He was just Gatsby.

The only mention of a black person is when Myrtle is killed. This happens after they go back to see Tom and Daisy. Part of the catastrophe is that Daisy produced a baby.

We begin to see the lies that underline everybody’s relationship e.g oxford.

Daisy is with Gatsby in the yellow car – golden colour.

We don’t see Gatsby through his eyes as they don’t give anything away, they are the cardboard in the billboard, the eyes don’t lead to a soul or a heart.

Myrtle has been the tragic victim of adultery, lies and deceit, of a phony meaningless dream, and does anybody care? This society is very suddenly revealed as a totally uncaring society in the ashes. It is the ashes of a caring society that these rich people drive and out of. The poor people are left high and dry, stranded, with a life more meaningless by the incursion of sudden death into the fake paradise that Jay Gatsby has been trying to create.

It’s his dream of paradise that causes Myrtle to die. Gatsby’s world comes to an end, and his world falls apart, so indeed does Nick’s. It seems as if the only reason for Nick’s existence was to worship at the shrine of Gatsby.

Gatsby is a bit like the statue of Ozymandias, an idol who is just going to fall apart in the desert.

How can this situation be resolved? Is there anything Fitzgerald can do with these/to/for these characters?

At the end of this chapter, Nick Carraway walks away. “So I walked away and left him standing there in the moonlight – watching over nothing” SUddenly, Gatsby has been reduced from the great Trimalchio, to somebody who is gazing into nothingness. A very relevant concept, ‘the edge of the abyss’, does it all fade away? Or is there going to be a climax?

Posted in

Chapter 6 Notes

Chapter 6 introduces the real Gatsby.

A journalist interviewed him due to his ‘notoriety’, not fame, emphasising the negative side of his popularity.

“Believing everything and nothing about him” Denying + confirming rumours. We are being warned to not fall for all the lies that these characters are making up.

Metta narrative moment? Nick Carraway is commenting on the fact that he is a narrator. Nick wants us to believe he is in complete control.

We get a lot of Gatsby’s upbringings, his influences and morals, but we don’t really believe it because we are getting fed up with all these lies.

Party in chapter 6 doesn’t work. One view is that a premonition of chaos/tragedy is introduced at this part of the story as the lies are beginning to speak up. However, others have felt that the chaos was sudden and unexpected, suggesting they bought into the illusion of the fun Jazz Age Fitzgerald represents, unaware of the dark undertone.

In various adaptations of the novel such as movies and plays, the main focus had been the lighthearted romantic aspect of this story, with singing, dancing, hedonism, etc. So when the tragedy does finally hit, it can be all the more painful and powerful
However, it is apparent that Fitzergald foreshadows the tragedy when focused. Gatsby’s dream of reliving the past, and winning Daisy, it’s pretty obvious it’s not going to work out.

Gatsby is trying to reclaim the past where he and Daisy had communication. Now, they are unable to communicate, one of the things this novel is about: miscommunication. This ties in with the unreliable narrator, they don’t know what they are saying to who or why.

“I wouldn’t ask too much of her,” I ventured. Ventured = cautious, self aware, polite
“Can’t repeat the past?” He cried incredulously = he doesn’t want to believe it
“Of course you can!” The highest point of his self belief, or self delusion.

The ideal world that Gatsby wishes to reclaim existed before the Great War. Gatsby is trying to stop the world, keep it from progressing, but that is impossible.

Nick doesn’t really judge him, until the last page in Chapter 6. It underscores the fruitfulness of Gatsby’s quest. It shows that NIck understands it but still does not want to say anything negative about it. “Appalling sentimentality” “A dumb man” – could be reffering to Nick himself as he has run out of things to say about Gatsby.

Posted in

GATSBY – Chapter 4 notes

Chapter 4 presents the contradiction between the perfection of the parties and the corruption of the city – that made the money possible. At the end of chapter 4, Nick realizes he is just being used by Gatsby to get Daisy.

What are the details of Gatsby’s constructed past?

  • “My family all died and I came into a good deal of money”
    • Idea of heritage – maybe Gatsby made this up to cover up his illegal doings
  • “I lived like a young raja in all the capitals of Europe”
  • “I tried very hard to die, but seemed to bear an enchanted life”
  • “Educated in Oxford”

All elements that present his prestigious and seemingly fictitious lifestyle  

What role does Wolfsheim play in this chapter?

  • The grubby capitalist
  • His primary goal is to make money 
  • Nasty, dangerous, corrupting
  • Taints other characters

What is the significance of the cars that pass Nick and Gatsby as they cross the bridge?

  • Contradiction between the perfection of the parties and the corruption of the city?
  • “Anything can happen now that we’ve slif over this bridge”

What parallels does McRae see between Gatsby and the character of Kurtz in The Heart of Darkness?

  • Both mysterious characters
    • Rumours
    • Introduced late in story
  • Both presented as a symbol 
    • Gatsby of new America
    • Kurtz of Europeans in Africa
  • Hollowness deep down
    • Illusion of happiness in Gatsby
  • Societal Implications
    • The arrogance of money in Gatsby (spoilt rich people)
    • The depredation of Europeans in Africa (slavery)
  • Historical representations
    • History of America’s newfound wealth
    • History of European colonization and its evil effects
Posted in

Historical Significance of Gatsby

 

 

 

Chapter 1 sets the scene about West Egg, East Egg, but as well as Nick Carraway’s past – his ambitions, his self image

What is the meaning of the novel’s epigraph?

  •  It’s about what a man will do to win the love of the woman he desires
    • So much of the novel is about Gatsby just trying to get Daisy back (e.g flexing luxury) but we learn that money can’t buy love
    • A novel that questions morals of the time

What are some of the features of the novel outlined in this lecture (focus especially on contradiction)?

  • Nick Carraway is introduced as a lucky, or advantaged, character. Yet when he travels to West Egg, we can see how much of a disadvantage he has (to people like Gatsby) due to his wealthiness.
  • The contradiction between West and East Coast. East Coast represents the golden jeunesse doree, superior compared to the hicks over at Midwest. 
  • The ‘ashes wasteland’ in contradiction to the wealth, beauty and lavishness of the Gatsby lifestyle
  • Narrative Contradiction: The way Nick narrates representing the contradictions in morality. He does it unconsciously as well.
    • “I had a dog – at least I had him for a few days until he ran away”
    • Misogynistic values – He’s never properly praised a woman “and an Old Doge and a Finnish Woman” suggests the car is more important than the woman. 
    • The yellow car that killed Myrtle was way more important than Myrtle
    • Within 3 lines he changes from being lonely to not lonely “I was lonely no longer”

What are some of the concepts/themes explored in the novel? What significance, in particular, does the historical background of modern America have in the book?

  • Money can’t buy love
  • Questions of modern morality
    • Irreligious society that believes in wealth and aspiration
  • Racism/White supremacy
  • The 1920’s gave birth to the age of people wanting to get famous purely for being famous and not actually contributing to society in a meaningful way
    • Hollowness of Jazz Age
  • Significance of the word ‘Golden’ throughout the novel: representing an abstract dream or goal, something intangible.
    • Relates with how the plot feels intangible as not that much happens
    • Point is that nothing is very explicit or clear in the novel (e.g don’t know who killed Myrtle)
    • Looking at the green light: it’s an unreachable dream (contradiction)
  • Key Idea What this novel is about? Question of the hero: Nick Carraway admires Gatsby for his wealth, attractiveness, mysteriousness etc.
    • The reader would also like to be Gatsby even though they know the success is hollow

Link with historical background?

  • Concept of ‘freedom’ and ‘American Identity’ stems from the colonisers (the Puritans, the Pilgrim fathers etc.). They went to America to find freedom and establish a nation.
  • American superiority complex underlies the full novel

What is meant by Nick being “An Unreliable Narrator”? Give examples.

  • Nick Carraway is shown to be a vulnerable character with moral values in the opening of the book. Therefore, he is going to think the best of everyone and not criticise them
  • The way Nick Carraway narrates this novel is almost through contradiction (e.g questioning moral superiority from the first three lines)
    • For example, Tom being racist  
  • All throughout the novel Nick just cares about his reputation and looking good – which leads him to making misjudgements (e.g letting Gatsby off the hook).
    • Nick struggles with managing in this hectic society in contrast to his dominance in page one
  • Key idea: Nick Carraway is the insecure narrator. He doesn’t tell lies. He is unreliable because he is not sure what he is seeing, where he is at, what he is talking about, what the overall motivation of why he moves to New York and moves back. 
    • He can’t reconcile the wealth gaps. He can’t reconcile his own moral standpoint or immoral behavior of the people around him.
    • His insecurity permeates through the novel therefore nothing is certain in the story as it’s from Nick’s perspective
    • Undermines his self image by the way he talks about his aspirations and other people
  • The way he narrates: He gives a fact and then takes it away. “I had a dog – at least I had him for a few days until he ran away”
    • This happens until the final page where all the ultimate contradictions come together (Assertion and denial)

 

Posted in