My Ecological Footprint

Sustainability; in its simplest terms, means the “well being for all, within the means of nature”. This is achieved by the use of global resources at a rate that allows natural regeneration, and minimises damage to the environment. In essence, it is the usage of resources in a manner which will ensure the prolonging and longevity of earth and the human race. The main factors that we as a human race need to look at are re-examining policies on protection of the environment, our responsibility as a society and the practice of our economics. Through the conservation and responsible use of non renewable resources such as coal and fossil fuels, that take millions of years to form into what we know and use them as today, there will be enough to provide for the future generations. Our ecological footprint is a measure to recognise how much we take away from nature; it takes into account how much agricultural, grazing, forest land and sea area it takes to provide for us based on the resources we consume. Through a more sustainable way of living, our ecological footprints can be reduced; with the amount of resources that we consume being consumed at a much lesser rate where there is time for it regenerate, the amount of natural area needed to sustain us will decrease as well. Since our ecological footprint is based on the amount of land it takes to provide for our resource intake, by taking in a more steady and conservative amount of resources we are reducing the amount of land we need.

I think that the biggest change I could make to my life in reducing my ecological footprint is taking public transport more often. Since I live far from school, time is a constraint in the morning, so I could do a one way bus trip for the mornings and take the MRT back after school. I can also use MRT and bus more often when meeting friends, as there are no real constraints on time. I could also, when choosing a Grab option, if I do need to, choose Grab Share and carpool with another rider or choose a more sustainable option in the Grab electric car. By doing so, I would greatly be reducing the amount of CO2 emissions that I generate using a car, thus reducing the greenhouse effect and contributing to a cooler climate, allowing heat to escape the atmosphere. I could also reduce the amount of time I spend with the A/C on and find ways to naturally cool the home, keeping windows open or using small hand powered fans. This will conserve the amount of fossil fuels burned for energy. I would choose to use less motor transport if I had to make one change forever, as this I feel is the biggest contributor to what might make me unsustainable. By doing so, I am contributing to a greater good in trying to create a cooler climate for a country that is already severely warm.

Second Sustainability Reflection

The best part of this project was working with teammates that I did not usually work with before. It was nice to get to know how other people work, and to strengthen the friendships that I already had with them through this project. During this project I have learned that our world is in a lot more danger than I thought it was, and I am contributing to this danger in more ways I could have imagined. It is nice to be aware of suggestions now, so I can implement them into my own life as well. The most challenging thing for me was to work with new people, even though it was the best part, as I did not know how they worked in a group dynamic so I had to adjust and adapt accordingly. In the end, it was a good experience and we worked well together too.

First Sustainability Reflection

Before starting the project, my group and I recognised that on the information sheet, the thing the client was looking to get out of this project was reducing his carbon footprint. He believed travelling was a large cause of his carbon footprint level. Therefore, we decided that transport and travel would be the sector we would focus on primarily, finding sustainable alternatives for Mr. Alchin in terms of local, regional and global travel.

Based on an estimate of the information our client gave us, we filled out an ecological footprint test to summarise our findings to him. We found that 67% of his ecological footprint is caused by his carbon footprint. Transport and mobility was the biggest sector that contributed to his carbon footprint. I think that we are going to recommend using public transport more often on weekends and holidays, since the client driving to school is non-negotiable.

Lance Armstrong and Doping

Respiration, in its simplest terms, is the “release of energy in cells by the breakdown of food substances”. It is the process by which we obtain energy through the food we intake; this energy we use to fuel our life processes of movement, growth, excretion and so on. Respiration is especially important when it comes to physical activity, such as sports. We need energy for everything we do, and this energy is created through the process of aerobic respiration.

In aerobic respiration, glucose and oxygen are transported to the mitochondria in cells, where a reaction takes place. Here, the glucose and oxygen react to produce energy which is then transferred to the cells.

Two waste products are created from this reaction; they are carbon dioxide and water. Animals release carbon dioxide back into the environment, and take oxygen in through the process of breathing (not to be confused with respiration: breathing is a muscular contraction whereas respiration is a chemical reaction).

Aerobic respiration is especially focused on in a sport like long distance biking. Cyclists’ bodies are required to continuously produce energy to fuel their bodies to keep pedalling. But, there are methods by which the process of respiration can be altered, to further improve the physical capabilities of the human body. This was the case in the professional cycling circuit, with a man named Lance Armstrong. He was famous for blood doping; this process consists of increasing the number of red blood cells in the bloodstream to enhance athletic abilities. Since blood carries oxygen from the lungs through to the muscles, a greater number of blood cells means more oxygen can be carried through to the muscles which results in more endurance.

A very commonly used method of blood doping is an injection of EPO (erythropoietin). EPO is hormone that is naturally produced in our bodies by the kidney, and it regulates the production of red blood cells. Injections of EPO are given to stimulate red blood cell production, and can be used to treat different stages of kidney diseases. In athletics, some athletes illegally inject EPO into their bloodstream to make their bodies produce higher amounts of red blood cells than usual, to enhance their endurance and performance.

Another common method of blood doping is through blood transfusions. In the medical world, blood transfusions are done to replace lost blood, or to treat those with a low red blood cell count. There are two main types of illegal blood transfusions done by athletes:

Autologous transfusion

The athlete draws their own blood, which is then stored for later use. By drawing their own blood, the athlete is ensuring that their body produces more blood cells to make up for the lost ones, and then they can inject the stored blood to further the red blood cell count even more.

Homologous transfusion

The athlete draws blood from someone else of the same blood type, for the same purpose.

A blood doping incident shocked the biking world, in the form of 7 time Tour de France winner Lance Armstrong, who saw himself stripped of all his titles and later publicly admitting to using banned performance enhancing drugs. He had faced repeated allegations of doping, but no official action was taken until 2006. Charges were continuously dropped and taken up once more until 2012, when the USADA (United States Anti Doping Agency) accused him of doping and drug trafficking based on collected blood samples and testimonies from Armstrong’s teammates. He was charged with using EPO and steroids, as well as blood transfusions as long as 16 years prior to the accusations. A year later, Armstrong publicly admitted using banned performance enhancing drugs on the Oprah show, and was consequently stripped of all Tour de France titles.

There could be a variety of opinions towards this issue; the honest answer that Lance himself provided was that, if he were racing in the modern cycling world, he would not do it again, but take him back to 1995 and he said that he would do it again. In my opinion, I think that he would not be likely to do it again; in the interview, he talks about how his kids hearing of this incident would absolutely crush him, and I think that now with the influence that his family has on him he would be encouraged to be clean, were he racing. If he did not have his family by his side, and like he said, if he was back in 1995, then he would probably do it again in my opinion as well.

Some Advice for My Future Self

In the future, to prepare myself better for science assessments I think that I have quite a few things to work on.

For example, I can start revising much earlier rather than leaving everything for the last minute because this will give me more time and is healthier than cramming the night before so that I can get a good night’s sleep before. I think that another important part would be for me to check with my teachers about what the important parts are that should be revised before starting, and what they think would be best to go through before taking the test. Clearing any and all doubts with them beforehand will be very beneficial to me, as I will know what specifically I will need to go through.

Another important thing for me to do next time would be to study with my other classmates, because getting ideas from them as well as solidifying my understanding of certain concepts will also be very beneficial to me. Going to the library in free time, or just talking to them in casual conversations will help a lot as it will help cement what I already know much better in my head and I will also be able to learn new concepts that I did not understand as well before or take away new ways to revise from my friends that they find effective, which I may also find effective.

Which is more important: a scientific law or a scientific theory?

A scientific theory is, in my opinion, more important than a scientific law. I believe this is so because a scientific theory can lead to finding so much more new evidence and making many more connections than a scientific law can; what I mean by this is that, once we figure out a law and model it using a mathematical equation, that law is fixed and we cannot change it. Very little or no new information can be found from this law now that we consider it a law and have been able to model it mathematically. A theory, on the other hand, is open to more speculation; using evidence from a theory, we can find so many more connections in the scientific world and draw so many more predictions which may result in the creation of more theories. In my opinion, I believe that debating theories lead to the creation of more and the finding of more evidence; therefore, it is my opinion that a scientific theory is more important than a scientific law.