After the initial submission, I got feedback from my supervisor about strengthening the analysis of my studies (adding to the narrative of the essay instead of purely describing them – a focus on ethics specifically has to be more explicit) to make my arguments between the two therapies more solid. Looking back to before I started my research, or even after I’d written my first 1000 words, it’s surprising how much knowledge I’ve gained on a subject I’d otherwise known hardly anything about – not only in terms of the content, but also the whole process of building an argument from scratch. At this point, I’m confident that all the information is there, it’s more a matter of adding certain links between ideas, generalising why the topic is worthy of study, refining the clarity and specificity of my research question, commenting on the influencing paradigms on psychology (behaviourism) – as identified by my supervisor.