“The Vine and the Fish” Reflection

The Vine and the Fish

The extended metaphor of “The Vine and the Fish” compares invasive species (the kudzu and the Asian carp/silverfin) to Asian Americans. In a way, the metaphor works. For one, it seems to say that, in a capitalist society such as the USA, immigrants (in the case of the article, Asian Americans) are seen as “invaders” and something to eradicate unless they contribute meaningfully to the economy. A second meaning that arises from the metaphor is that Americans see immigrants as “invaders”: something initially useful but ultimately detrimental to the American environment and lifestyle; and eventually the idea engrains itself into the minds of Asian Americans. in a way, the invasive species not only represents Asian Americans but also the internal racism that Asian immigrants learn. Hook seems to be criticising the American tendency to categorise people into strict groupings, and then exclude people based on these categorisations, when the situation is a lot more nuanced; for example, the kudzu, while an invasive species, offers many benefits like a source of nutrients or being able to be made into shampoo. In fact, she points out that language plays a large role into this categorisation and exclusion; the fact that the Asian carp is connected to Asians and the fact that Trump calls the coronavirus the “Chinese virus” makes it easier for people justify excluding immigrants.

However, from an environmentalist perspective, the metaphor becomes unstable. Because, regardless of the economic benefits that kudzu or the Asian carp offers, it is undeniable that invasive species destroy native ecosystems and environments. By adhering to the metaphor set by Hook, it would seem that the most obvious solution would be to stop immigration completely.  Hook simplifies two complex situations to create her metaphor. Likewise, the metaphor ignores the voices of Native Americans, who would be the actual native environment being “invaded” in the context of the metaphor, not the voices of white Americans.

English Lit HL IO Reflection

Challenges

  • Time limit of 10 minutes
    • Had to take out some evidence and analysis
      • Shortened analysis of “scrawny, lank gray hair” from The RoTook out analysis of “… very few superior individuals, made of the stuff of martyrs and saints”
  • Development of global issue
    • Stuck in mentality that I had to focus on how environment affects moral values, but eventually realized that both texts emphasized more on how the transformation of moral values affect one’s environment (community)
    • Wanted to show change in thesis, so wanted exploration of the chosen global issue to develop more in analysis of the second text, The Road, but it seemed really similar to my exploration in If This is a Man
  • Organizing the ten bullet points

 

Good

  • Learning of the context and connecting it to the text and its global issue
  • Connecting two texts and respective authors’ perspectives on the global issue to modern-day situations/context
    • BLM protests, Coronavirus, etc

Beginning Notes

Script

Peer Feedback

Final Shortened Script

Atonement: Movie vs Book

  • I think the act of Movie Briony being shown that she has already shared her real name as a nurse to a patient makes the fact she does so with the French soldier less impactful
  • However, it does kind of show that at this stage she is already rebelling against the lack of individuality of the hospital
  • Forgot to write down: Cecilia and Robbie don’t walk with Briony down the station in the movie; instead they are shown making out in their apartment as Briony leaves

Paper 1 Practice Prose: Atonement

scan_jung85326_2020-04-17-15-13-31

Comments:

  • Need to work on time management and grouping concepts; I had a hard time deciding how to outline my essay
  • I don’t think I annotated my extract enough; likewise, I forgot the topic, so I wasn’t particularly focused on annotating the extract to answer the question
  • Teacher’s comments: too repetitive (mentioned “tension” too much) and didn’t qualify what tension meant or what it achieved; didn’t contextualise the extract, so some of the points are confusing; needed to zoom in more
    • I need to remember to mention things outside the extract if they are important in relation to the extract and topic (ie heat)
  • I think I chose a bad extract for me because I’m not sure if I actually understood the techniques used in the extract or how it contributed to building tension

Paper 1 Practice Poem: The Kindness

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1e-Hx1H4BoELZnIMozOJ90tZStB4832D5uxunEcL5ARo/edit?usp=sharing

Comments:

  • Teacher’s comments: Forgot to talk about or mention lineation; sometimes need clarification on points
  • Challenges: deciding on how to organise topics of body paragraphs and relate them to theme of kindness and beauty
  • Personal notes: For body paragraph 3, I should switch the last sentence with the topic sentence because it’s much more clearer whereas my original topic sentence was a bit messy and made more sense after I finished showing all my evidence; I spent around three days planning out and writing the essay, and most of the time went into organising concepts and deciding what evidence to use from my notes and what I should keep out; need to work on time management

Map and The English Patient

– I had a lot of trouble with organizing; I had a lot of ideas and concepts I could spot out and wanted to address, but I didn’t know how to connect them together or how to group them

– I ended up dropping most just to keep it coherent

– I think the first thing I should think about when outlining is my body paragraphs and how I’m categorizing them. As in, am I going “chronologically” by what’s mentioned first? Or am I jumping back and forth the narrative timeline to address general concepts? It’s probably best that it’s a mix of both; group into general concepts but still follow the timeline so I don’t confuse myself and the reader

Sestina

– Keep in mind connotations of words; maintain the vibe

– Got messy near the end; rewrite last two stanzas to make clear what is happening

– Maybe get creative with words and homophones (ie see and sea) to spice things up

– With enjambment, to make things look smoother maybe don’t capitalize words at the beginning of each line

Political Correctness and Comedy

It’s impossible for a joke to be completely inoffensive, and it’s impossible to cater a joke to match everyone’s sense of humor. I think the most important to think of 1) why does it offend particular people? 2) is offending them your goal?/do you not mind offending them? and 3) what is the aim of the joke?/what is the joke laughing at? Comedy is a lot about finding your stance and solidifying it; it’s one of the ways in which people find the group they fit in with, and in a lot of ways, about expression of identity. So, in comedy, I think it’s very important to know where you draw the line and making sure you don’t cross the line.

Cleese also mentioned how all humor is critical. Just as how jokes are meant to be critical of aspects of society, the audience should also be critical of the joke. Likewise, so should comedians. The jokes they make, after all, establishes their identity, personal or public.

Mariella mentioned about how culture and generation could have affected Cleese’s, and other people’s, take on political correctness and society’s relation to comedy. On one hand, I can understand where they are coming from; a lot of people tend to go to extreme and go from “don’t offend the vulnerable” to “don’t be critical/offensive at all”. On the other hand, I have heard a lot of comedians complain about political correctness and how they can no longer use insults towards a minority as a joke. If the times have changed, then shouldn’t comedians also change to fit the times? There are other ways to make jokes. It’s no longer revolutionary or outstanding in any way to dehumanize people of color or other minority groups.

Ms Werner also talked about how it depends on who is telling the joke. A white person can’t joke about black people; goyim can’t make fun of Jewish people but can make fun of the Irish. I think it depends on what the joke is. A white person can joke about black people, but are they using negative stereotypes to make the joke? I mentioned before that jokes are usually how people form social groups; jokes are a way to notify people of their values and perspectives on topics, as well as to welcome and encourage people of similar takes. If a person, for example, jokes about how all Mexicans are thieves, then others know where they stand on that issue; it will also affirm to others of similar perspectives that it is alright to think this way and not change. I think that a reason why people are more “sensitive” to comedy these days is because there’s a lot more power in speaking up, possibly due to how easy it is to communicate ideas via social media or how easy it is to learn about something via internet. Before, it might’ve been harder because speaking up would only reach locals and wouldn’t change anything in society overall, so it was easier to just let it go. I think people just had enough of allowing people to perpetuate stereotypes that have effectively led to deaths.