The character od Karmat Lone argues that citizenship is a privilege, not a right. It can be revoked if the government thinks appropriate.
There are 2 articles on the Washington Post and the Daily Mail, where they talk about Shamima Begum, who left the UK in February 2015, aged 15, to join the ISIS and wanting to return home to Britain. The problem, in this case, is the citizenship of Shamima, as none of the Western countries is wanting to give their citizenship to her. The Washington Post showed the problems and arguments that are occurring, by placing in the views from British Home Secretary, Sajid Javid. The Daily Mail was more explicit to how the author felt about the issue, without considerations and thoughts of other people involved in the case. I think that the Daily Mail is a taboo, as there is a strong self spoken message that is written to make the readers get the mindset on how bad Shamima is, from joining the ISIS.
From the articles and learning about the case, I feel that since the UK let her become the person she is now, the country should hold the responsibility for this. From considering the international law that it is illegal to put a person to become stateless, it is important to consider this case for similar cases that would possibly occur in the future as well.
This case is similar to Pavaiz’s case in Home Fire, in the way the issue of citizenship for the individuals come up. But the main difference that I see in the two cases is that Eamonn didn’t know what he was going and just wanted to be closer to his father, but he was a 19-year-old. However, Shamima Begum would have been educated was aware of what she was going into, but she was a 15 year old. From the considerations, there are possibly different views on each of the issues.