CU: Our paradigms are inevitably subjective. They are constructed from the interpretation of the knowledge that we already posses and compel us to shape our future interpretations in a similar manner.
Explanation with reference to the River Boat Story: In terms of sensory information, both the steam boat pilot and the passenger witnessed the same scene. The pilot possessed knowledge of how to navigate the river because he was trained in that manner. However, the passenger was not: he did not posses any knowledge of the same regard. Therefore, the preconception with which they both viewed the state of the river were distinct. Upon noticing different details about the river, the pilot used what he had learnt previously about the river to interpret what they signified: a warning. On the other hand, (as a product of lack of education on the same subject) the passenger shaped his interpretation on what little he had experienced in the past – perhaps that the setting sun was quite a vision. Thus, he simply resolved to seeing the beauty in the sight that lay before him. Perhaps, it is not that the pilot did not see the beauty of the river in that moment, but that the additional knowledge he had of the river, overshadowed that reaction with something that was more pre-eminent. By mastering the language of the river, it can be argued that the pilot has both ‘gained’ and ‘lost’ something. He has lost the ability to ever simply see and appreciate the beauty of the river alone without dread invading his thoughts. However he has gained a more valuable and realistic understanding of the river which grants him the advantage of knowing how to avoid a few of the dangers that he would have previously been ignorant to.