TOK – Reshaping the way we view the world

Last week we read the Nacirema article which was very eye-opening and quite misleading, which was the whole point of the article. We were asked to think of a similar example of something familiar to us described to the point where it was practically unrecognizable. Initially, the first example I thought of (I had read it somewhere before) was the movie where it starts off with a scene of a big family; a mother, a father who had just left, and several children. In the first few minutes, the mother and all but one of the children are brutally murdered, leaving the father devastated when he sees the carnage and his sole surviving son. Fast-forwarding a couple of years, despite establishing hard rules for his son’s safety, his son was kidnapped and held in inhumane conditions. The father does not give up and embarks on a long and challenging journey to find his son again, which he eventually does after facing many difficulties on the way. This movie is called Finding Nemo.

Another example that I could think of is how some individuals will willingly make a dish for consumption using ingredients harvested from cattle – the rich-in nutrients liquid intended for infants of this species – as well as extracting the pulp from a special type of rigid grass. From this there are many variations of the dish, my personal favourite is to combine it with special leaves ground up traditionally by granite stones into a fine powder. Individuals must, unfortunately, wait several hours to consume this dish and must endure the brutal torture of placing said dish into a special bunker, which controls the environment and manipulates the state of matter of the dish into the intended state. Only after a couple of hours can you enjoy the matcha ice cream that you very much deserve.

Posted in TOK

ENGLISH – Glengarry Glen Ross ongoing notes

Details about the play and the movie/inconsistencies: AIDA and ABC

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1tAdRmO8DpVWCMN0tao5zPmCl5-568JUieR226QfJTHE/edit

 

Act One. Scene One.

Leads are people who are interested in buying property and have money. Leads are only given to the top salesmen. Williamson is in control in this scene.

Watching the movie.

The scene with Alec Baldwin first of all was never originally written into the play, but this scene in the movie added a new dimension to the plot. We talked about how in the play, the characters were unlikeable, but with the context of Alec Baldwin’s super-predator and powerful presence, we have a sudden bout of sympathy for the salesmen. Just to get some initial thoughts down, I would definitely say this play is about something more than just salesmen begging for leads that they can close. Money? Manhood? America? It could be something about manhood or the American dream, or more like the fallacy of the American dream. These salesmen are expected to make money out of nothing, or out of “toilet paper”, mirroring the values of the American dream where you can do anything as long as you put the effort in. In reality, this isn’t the case and sometimes it’s just not possible. Manhood – well there’s more of that in the movie than in the play in my opinion. Alec Baldwin’s character sort of visibly has them by the balls, and Williamson (Kevin Spacey) just happens to have a backbone and doesn’t let Shelly get to him, which is what we can see in the play. The line of reasoning Baldwin’s character uses on the salesmen, like “I can close this in 2 hours tonight, can you? Yes or no” sort of leaves them with not much room to back out. Either they promise something they’re convinced is impossible and left with no choice but to try and do it, appearing to retaliate and appeal to the whole ideal of ‘who’s the alpha here’, OR they say no and they’re not only forced to hit the bricks, but they admit to being “weak” and not as powerful as the $76,000 BMW and watch guy. The manhood part is a little amusing to be honest, where right after when Baldwin’s character, instead of immediately trying to close the leads, they talk about it for a little while and they’re like “are we really gonna let this guy talk to us like this?”. Interesting priorities.

Is the play staggeringly inarticulate? Are we talking or are we just talking?